彩云网下载|彩云网官方

来源：彩云网平台2024-03-25 17:48

访中国—东盟商务理事会执行理事长：今年东盟经济呈复苏态势******

　　中新社北京12月6日电题：访中国—东盟商务理事会执行理事长：今年东盟经济呈复苏态势

　　作者刘文文

　　近三年来，比邻而居的中国与东盟互为最大贸易伙伴和重要的投资合作伙伴。2022年终将至，东盟今年经济形势如何？中国与东盟贸易情况如何？中新社近日就此采访了中国—东盟商务理事会执行理事长、RCEP产业合作委员会主席、中国首席东盟商务专家许宁宁。

　　谈及今年东盟地区经济总体形势，他表示，东盟地区经济增长率2020年是-3.2%，2021年为3.0%，预计今明两年将达4.9%和5.2%。预计今年东盟十国中越南、菲律宾、马来西亚经济增速位于前列。

　　先说越南，许宁宁提到，越南政府预测今年越南经济将增长8%。第三季度，越南GDP增速超出预期，同比增长13.67%，使前9月GDP增速达到8.83%。

　　前11月，越南宏观经济保持平稳，核心通胀率控制在既定目标4%以下。前11月，越南货物贸易达6738.2亿美元，同比增长11.8%。从国别看，中国是越南最大的进口国，美国是越南最大的出口国。

　　他还透露，越南是东盟签署自由贸易协定最多的国家之一，仅次于新加坡。目前，越南参加了15项自由贸易协定，为越南经济复苏创造了有利条件。

　　再说菲律宾，许宁宁介绍，第三季度菲律宾经济增速快于预期，增长7.6%；前9月，增长7.7%。预计全年将超过菲律宾政府6.5-7.5%的年度增长目标。

　　但他也提醒，尽管第三季度的经济表现好于预期，菲律宾仍面临通胀飙升和利率上升的不利因素，10月份通胀率达到7.7%，为14年来最高。

　　提到马来西亚，许宁宁介绍，第三季度经济增长14.2%，前9个月同比经济增长9.36%，经济增长主要推动力是私人消费和投资增长、大量出口和有利的基数效应。预计今年全年马来西亚经济增长将达7%。

　　谈及中国与越南、菲律宾、马来西亚的贸易情况时，他说，前10月，中国与越南贸易增长3.5%，中国与菲律宾贸易增长10.0%，中国与马来西亚贸易增长20.1%。

　　以越南、菲律宾、马来西亚为代表，目前，东盟呈现经济复苏态势，成为全球经济中的稳定地区。然而，当前全球经济增速放缓、全球产业链供应链受阻不畅、全球及区域通胀压力加大、能源危机和粮食危机等多重负面因素叠加影响的形势，使得具外向型特点的东盟经济面临着严峻考验。

　　许宁宁进一步说，为此，东盟正在着力推进共同体建设，落实《区域全面经济伙伴关系协定》(RCEP)和提升有关多边双边自由贸易协定的开放水平，开创数字经济、绿色经济新增长空间，深化与对话伙伴合作。

　　他强调，东盟地区在中国实施共建“一带一路”、“双循环”经济发展对外循环中具有重要的位置。当前，中国与东盟各国正在中国—东盟全面战略伙伴关系建设中推进经济合作，携手发展。(完)

彩云网下载

中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事******

　　中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。

资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。

　　2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。

　　日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。

　　日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。

　　事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。

　　因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。

　　日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。

　　《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。

　　德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。

　　日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。

　　国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。

　　太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。

　　Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business

　　By John Lee

　　(ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year.

　　Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business.

　　The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster.

　　On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year.

　　The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public.

　　In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run.

　　Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public.

　　The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution.

　　The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community.

　　The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses.

　　According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan.

　　As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment.

　　However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact.

　　Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad.

　　The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies.

　　If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence.